슈톡하우젠의 반지

슈톡하우젠이 바그너의 "반지"보다 긴 오페라를 썼다는 이야기. 25년동안이나 썼다니 슈톡하우젠의 난해한 모더니즘적 스타일이 그대로 들어있을 것인데 과연?

전체 목록 보기

목록안의 메시지 1 글쓴이:Nigel Curtis (cn_curtis@runbox.com) 제목:Wagner versus Stockhausen View this article only 뉴스그룹:humanities.music.composers.wagner 날짜:2005-01-20 02:57:59 PST

Have any of you been following Stockhausen's seven part "LICHT" opera
cycle? It  was completed last year -  some 29 hours of music writen
over 25 years. Mittwoch and Sonntag still have to be staged and the
other five are all awaiting a revival.

Is the cycle worthy of being spoken about in the same breath as
Wagner's Ring..?

Thanks Nigel Curtis

이 메시지에 대한 답변 작성

목록안의 메시지 2 글쓴이:Derrick Everett (mimirswell@hotmail.com) 제목:Re: Wagner versus Stockhausen View this article only 뉴스그룹:humanities.music.composers.wagner 날짜:2005-01-21 02:43:41 PST

"Is the cycle worthy of being spoken about in the same breath as
Wagner's Ring..?"

No.  In fact, nobody speaks about Stockhausen any more.  They just
shake their heads.

--
Derrick Everett

이 메시지에 대한 답변 작성

목록안의 메시지 3 글쓴이:Mike Scott Rohan (mike.scott.rohan@asgard.zetnet.co.uk) 제목:Re: Wagner versus Stockhausen View this article only 뉴스그룹:humanities.music.composers.wagner 날짜:2005-01-21 16:29:02 PST

The message <3f30d241.0501200257.48bf7da0@posting.google.com>
from cn_curtis@runbox.com (Nigel Curtis) contains these words:

> Have any of you been following Stockhausen's seven part "LICHT" opera
> cycle? It  was completed last year -  some 29 hours of music writen
> over 25 years. Mittwoch and Sonntag still have to be staged and the
> other five are all awaiting a revival.

The only one I can remember seeing is Donnerstag, and that...

> Is the cycle worthy of being spoken about in the same breath as
> Wagner's Ring..?

Maybe the cough at the end. Stockhausen's sonic language simply doesn't
have anything like the expressiveness of Wagner's, let alone his graphic
and dramatic powers. Heard out of context, it's just noise -- pretty
much the same *in* context, really, there seems to be no real human
anchor. Plenty of Stockhausen self-expression, maybe, but it doesn't
travel. A Bungert de nos jours.

Cheers,

Mike

-- 
mike.scott.rohan@asgard.zetnet.co.uk

이 메시지에 대한 답변 작성

©2005 Google

Tweet